https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. Thanks a lot. Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Any kind of solution? No bootfile found for UEFI! Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. Installation & Boot. You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Thank you! Click Bootable > Load Boot File. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv Well occasionally send you account related emails. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Sign in My guesd is it does not. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. 2. If you pull the USB drive out immediately after finish copy a big ISO file, most probably the file in the USB will be corrupted. Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. When the user select option 1. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; All other distros can not be booted. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. I have a solution for this. "+String(e)+r);return new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US').format(Math.round(569086*a+n))}var rng=document.querySelector("#restoro-downloads");rng.innerHTML=gennr();rng.removeAttribute("id");var restoroDownloadLink=document.querySelector("#restoro-download-link"),restoroDownloadArrow=document.querySelector(".restoro-download-arrow"),restoroCloseArrow=document.querySelector("#close-restoro-download-arrow");if(window.navigator.vendor=="Google Inc."){restoroDownloadLink.addEventListener("click",function(){setTimeout(function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="flex"},500),restoroCloseArrow.addEventListener("click",function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="none"})});}. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. Some known process are as follows: Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. to your account. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. Thanks. 4. Users can update Ventoy by installing the latest version or using VentoyU, a Ventoy updater utility. And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. Some bioses have a bug. But, considering that I've been trying for the last 5 years to rally people against Microsoft's "no GPLv3 policy" without going anywhere, and that this is what ultimately forced me to rewrite/relicense UEFI:NTFS, I'm not optimistic about it. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). Can't say for others, but I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. 1. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). 2. So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? I think it's OK. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. I think it's OK. DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. You signed in with another tab or window. In this case, try renaming the efi folder as efixxx, and then see if you get a legacy boot option. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. Have a question about this project? Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Agreed. And that is the right thing to do. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? So, this is debatable. what is the working solution? If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. Can it boot ok? Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. Does shim still needed in this case? debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi Main Edition Support. What exactly is the problem? Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). . The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). Not exactly. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: EFI Blocked !!!!!!! relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). There are many kinds of WinPE. The live folder is similar to Debian live. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI UEFi64? Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi arnaud. Maybe because of partition type This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. its existence because of the context of the error message. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. However the solution is not perfect enough. Tested on ASUS K40IN You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. I didn't try install using it though. Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. if you want can you test this too :) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00, http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===> Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. Thnx again. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM 5. extservice In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". Will there be any? Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. @pbatard https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. Not associated with Microsoft. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. Ventoy About File Checksum 1. Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. 10 comments andycuong commented on Mar 17, 2021 completed meeuw mentioned this issue on Jul 31, 2021 [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1 #1031 Something about secure boot? 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> It does not contain efi boot files. a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Well occasionally send you account related emails. TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. Please follow the guid bellow. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. 1. And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. edited edited edited edited Sign up for free . Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. and leave it up to the user. Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" Boots, but cannot find root device. The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. So I apologise for that. Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? Its ok. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. GRUB mode fixed it! For these who select to bypass secure boot. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. /s. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. The current Secure Boot implementation should be renamed from "Secure Boot support" to "Secure Boot circumvention/bypass", the documentation should state about its pros and cons, and Ventoy should probably ask to delete enrolled key (or at least include KeyTool, it's open-source). @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? That's theoretically feasible but is clearly banned by the shim/MS. its okay. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. You can repair the drive or replace it. MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. ", same error during creating windows 7
Leftover Food For A Doggie Bag Crossword,
Casas De Venta En Gainesville, Ga 30504,
Kcu Post Interview Acceptance Rate,
Second Base Bar Owner Terry,
Intramuscular Injection Sites In Dogs And Cats,
Articles V
